Scott et al v. Regions Bank et al
Filing
159
ORDER ; it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants' objections are OVERRULED, that this Report and Recommendation 149 , is ADOPTED and APPROVED, and that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 110 , is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Helen Scott's "Motion for Hearing and Motion to Stay Proceedings," 138 , is DENIED. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 3/11/10. (KDO)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE
MARK A. SCOTT and PAUL E. SCOTT v. REGIONS BANK, ET AL.
) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER
NO. 2:08-CV-296
This matter is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, [Doc. 149], dated January 26, 2009. In that Report and Recommendation the magistrate judge recommends that the Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. 110], filed by Defendant Helen Scott and joined by Defendant Andrea LaFollette be denied. The defendants have filed several objections to this report and recommendation. After careful and de novo consideration of the record as a whole, and after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons set out in that Report and Recommendation, which are incorporated by reference herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants' objections are OVERRULED , that this Report and Recommendation is
ADOPTED and APPROVED, [Doc. 149], and that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED, [Doc. 110]. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Helen Scott's "Motion for Hearing and Motion to Stay Proceedings," [Doc. 138], is DENIED. ENTER:
s/J. RONNIE GREER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?