Shelton v. Techpack America, Inc et al

Filing 30

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion is DENIED as to plaintiff's claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., that she was not paid for all the overtime that she turned into her supervisor for payment during the time period specified in the memorandum opinion. The motion is GRANTED in all other respects. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike the Affidavit of Tina Hodges and the Inadmissible Exhibits Offered in Support of the Affidavit 22 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge R Leon Jordan on May 6, 2011. (AYB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
GREENEVILLE DIVISION
KRISTI L. SHELTON,
Plaintiff,

v.
TECHPACK AMERICA INC. and
TINA HODGES, individually,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 2:10-CV-89

ORDER
For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion filed contemporaneously
with this order, the “Motion for Summary Judgement” filed by defendant [doc. 16] is
GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is DENIED as to plaintiff’s
claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., that she was not paid for
all the overtime that she turned into her supervisor for payment during the time period
specified in the memorandum opinion. The motion is GRANTED in all other respects.
“Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Affidavit of Tina Hodges and the Inadmissible Exhibits
Offered in Support of the Affidavit” [doc. 22] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTER:
s/ Leon Jordan
United States District Judge