Shelton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Filing 6

ORDER denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; adopting Report and Recommendations re 5 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 8/9/10. (PCS)

Download PDF
Shelton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of Doc. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at GREENEVILLE LISA G. SHELTON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Plaintiff Lisa Shelton filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Court Doc. 1] on June 18, 2010 which was later supplemented [Court Doc. 4] on July 19, 2010 following United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee's Order [Court Doc. 3]. Magistrate Judge Lee filed her Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's IFP application [Court Doc. 5] on July 20, 2010 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Neither party filed objections within the given 14 days. After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Lee's report and recommendation. The Court thus ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Lee's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Court Doc. 1] is DENIED. Because the Court accepts and adopts Magistrate Judge Lee's Case No. 2:10-cv-135 Judge Mattice recommendations to accommodate Plaintiff's financial situation, however, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff may pay the $350.00 filing fee in installments of $35.00 per month for ten months. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file Plaintiff's Complaint upon payment of the Dockets.Justia.com first installment. Plaintiff is further ORDERED to serve the Complaint at her own cost. SO ORDERED this 9th day of August, 2010. s/ Harry S. Mattice, Jr. HARRY S. MATTICE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?