Smith v. Howerton

Filing 14

ORDER denying 11 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 11/18/13. (mailed to George Smith) (GRE, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE GEORGE ARTHUR SMITH, also known as “Lee,” Plaintiff, v. TONY HOWERTON, Warden, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:12-cv-399-CLC-SKL ORDER This pro se prisoner’s petition for a federal writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is before the Court upon two motions, the first of which is Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel to assist him in this matter [Doc. 11]. Though the constitutional right to counsel in criminal prosecutions does not apply to habeas corpus cases, Barker v. Ohio, 330 F.2d 594, 594 (6th Cir. 1964), a district court may appoint counsel to represent an indigent litigant. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The appointment of counsel in a civil case is justified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances. Lavado v. Keohane, 992 F.2d 601, 606 (6th Cir. 1993). Upon careful consideration of the issues and complexity of this case and Plaintiff’s ability to represent himself, the Court concludes that the appointment of counsel is not warranted under the particular circumstances presented here. See Mira v. Marshall, 806 F.2d 636 (6th Cir. 1986). The motion for appointment of counsel is therefore DENIED. In the second motion before the Court, Plaintiff requests an extension of time to file a reply to Defendant’s answer to the complaint [Doc. 12]. Plaintiff requested the Court allow him to submit a reply to Defendant’s answer, and to permit the reply to be filed on or before November 21, 2013. Plaintiff has since filed a reply to Defendant’s answer to the complaint [Doc. 13]. Under Rule 5(e) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, Plaintiff “may submit a reply to the respondent’s answer or other pleading within a time fixed by the judge.” As Plaintiff has already filed his reply, the motion for extension is DENIED as moot and Plaintiff’s reply is deemed timely filed. SO ORDERED. ENTER: s/fâátÇ ^A _xx SUSAN K. LEE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?