McGuire v. Encore Capital Group, Inc. et al
Filing
40
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 28 Report and Recommendations ; granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. It is hereby ORDERED that this Report and Recommendation is ADOPT ED and APPROVED, that the portion of plaintiff's motion which seeks dismissal be GRANTED, that the motion to quash portion be DENIED AS MOOT, and that the case against this defendant be DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 9/8/2014. (LMC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT GREENEVILLE
LOUELLA McGUIRE,
Plaintiff,
v.
ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO.: 2:13-CV-99
ORDER
This Fair Debt Collection Practices Act matter is before the Court to consider the Report
and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated November 5, 2013. In that
Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant Lila Sand’s,
motion to dismiss be granted, [Doc. 22]. The motion actually asks for two distinctly different
kinds of relief. First, she asks to quash service of process. Second, she seeks to dismiss for lack
of personal jurisdiction. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation.
After careful consideration of the record as a whole, and after careful consideration of the
Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons set out in
that Report and Recommendation which are incorporated by reference herein, it is hereby
ORDERED that this Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and APPROVED, [Doc. 28],
that the portion of plaintiff’s motion which seeks dismissal be GRANTED, that the motion to
quash portion be DENIED AS MOOT, and that the case against this defendant be DISMISSED.
E N T E R:
s/J. RONNIE GREER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?