McGuire v. Encore Capital Group, Inc. et al

Filing 40

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 28 Report and Recommendations ; granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. It is hereby ORDERED that this Report and Recommendation is ADOPT ED and APPROVED, that the portion of plaintiff's motion which seeks dismissal be GRANTED, that the motion to quash portion be DENIED AS MOOT, and that the case against this defendant be DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 9/8/2014. (LMC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE LOUELLA McGUIRE, Plaintiff, v. ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC., ET AL., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO.: 2:13-CV-99 ORDER This Fair Debt Collection Practices Act matter is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated November 5, 2013. In that Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant Lila Sand’s, motion to dismiss be granted, [Doc. 22]. The motion actually asks for two distinctly different kinds of relief. First, she asks to quash service of process. Second, she seeks to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. After careful consideration of the record as a whole, and after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons set out in that Report and Recommendation which are incorporated by reference herein, it is hereby ORDERED that this Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and APPROVED, [Doc. 28], that the portion of plaintiff’s motion which seeks dismissal be GRANTED, that the motion to quash portion be DENIED AS MOOT, and that the case against this defendant be DISMISSED. E N T E R: s/J. RONNIE GREER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?