Ricker v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Filing 29

ORDER: The Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 28 ]. The plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings [Doc. 22 ] is DENIED; the defendant's motion for summary judgment [Doc. 24 ] is GRANTED; the Commissioner's decision in this case denying plaintiff's application for benefits under the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED; and this case is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on 1/25/16. (JBR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE BOBBY G. RICKER ) ) v. ) ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security ) No. 2:14-CV-256 ORDER This Social Security case is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 28] of United States Magistrate Judge C. Clifford Shirley, Jr., dated December 31, 2015. In that Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Shirley recommends that the plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings [Doc. 22] be denied and that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. 24] be granted. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed and the time for doing so has passed. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), E.D. Tenn. L.R. 7.2. The Court has carefully reviewed this matter, including the administrative record and the underlying pleadings [Docs. 14, 22, 23, 24, 25]. The Court is in agreement with Magistrate Judge Shirley’s recommendation which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 28]. The plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings [Doc. 22] is DENIED; the defendant’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. 24] is GRANTED; the Commissioner’s decision in this case denying plaintiff’s application for benefits under the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED; and this case is DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Thomas W. Phillips SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?