King v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 18

ORDER granting 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 17 Report and Recommendations. It is hereby ORDERED that this Report and Recommendation is ADOPTE D and APPROVED, that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and that the defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 9/23/2015. (LMC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE BRADLEY JOSEPH KING, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:14-CV-317 ORDER This Social Security matter is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated August 31, 2015, [Doc. 17]. In that Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, [Doc. 13], be granted. The magistrate judge also recommends that defendant’s motion for summary judgment, [Doc. 15], be denied. Neither party has filed objections to this recommendation. Thus, after careful consideration of the record as a whole, including the Administrative Transcript, and after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons set out in that Report and Recommendation which are incorporated by reference herein, it is hereby ORDERED that this Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and APPROVED, [Doc. 17], that the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, [Doc. 13], is GRANTED and that defendant’s motion for summary judgment, [Doc. 15], is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings. E N T E R: s/J. RONNIE GREER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?