Dimizio v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Filing 44

ORDER granting 40 Motion for Attorney Fees; adopting Report and Recommendations re 43 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 10/20/2017. (BDG, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at GREENEVILLE DONNA DIMIZIO, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:16-cv-6 Judge Mattice Magistrate Judge Corker ORDER On September 28, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Clifton Corker filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 43) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Magistrate Judge Corker recommended that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 40) be granted, and that Plaintiff be awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $5,130.00. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.1 Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the record in this matter, and the undersigned agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s well-reasoned conclusions. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Corker’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. 40) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff SHALL be awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $ 5,130.00.                                                              While Magistrate Judge Corker did not specifically advise the parties that they had 14 days in which to object to the Report and Recommendation and that failure to do so would waive their right to appeal, the parties’ right to do so is clearly set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). See also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 148-51 (1985) (noting that “[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings”). In addition, Plaintiff’s Motion was unopposed by the Defendant. 1 SO ORDERED this 20th day of October, 2017.               /s/ Harry S. Mattice, Jr._____ HARRY S. MATTICE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?