Davis v. Social Security, Commissioner of (JRG2)

Filing 24

ORDER denying 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 18 Report and Recommendations; adopting Report and Recommendations re 23 Report and Recommendations. Thus, after careful consideration of the record as a whole, including the Administrative Transcript, and after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation and Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons set out in those Re ports and Recommendations which are incorporated by reference herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Reports and Recommendations are ADOPTED and APPROVED, [Docs. 18, 23], that the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, [Doc. 13], is GRANTED and that defendant's motion for summary judgment, [Doc. 15], is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 06/21/2017. (CAT)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT GREENEVILLE
SCOTTY RAY DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 2:16-CV-143

ORDER
This Social Security matter is before the Court to consider the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Corker dated May 10, 2017, [Doc. 18], and
the Supplemental Report and Recommendation dated May 26, 2017. [Doc. 23]. In that Report
and Recommendation, [Doc. 18], Magistrate Judge Corker recommends that the plaintiff’s
motion for judgment on the pleadings, [Doc. 13], be granted.

The Magistrate Judge also

recommends that defendant’s motion for summary judgment, [Doc. 15], be denied. The plaintiff
then filed a “Motion for Clarification” of the Report and Recommendation.

[Doc. 19].

Magistrate Judge Corker heard oral argument on the motion for clarification and issued the
Supplemental Report and Recommendation. [Doc. 23]. Neither party has filed objections to the
report and recommendation, other than the “motion for clarification,” and neither party has filed
objections to the supplemental report and recommendation.
Thus, after careful consideration of the record as a whole, including the Administrative
Transcript, and after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation and Supplemental
Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons set out in
those Reports and Recommendations which are incorporated by reference herein, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Reports and Recommendations are ADOPTED and APPROVED, [Docs. 18,
23], that the plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, [Doc. 13], is GRANTED and that
defendant’s motion for summary judgment, [Doc. 15], is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that
this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings.
ENTER:

s/J. RONNIE GREER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE