Cutshall v. Little et al

Filing 38

JUDGMENT ORDER, Defendants' motions to dismiss [Doc. 35 and 36 ] are GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Because the Court has CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Clifton L. Corker on 4/28/21. (ADA)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT GREENEVILLE
DANNY RAY ALLEN CUTSHALL,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAKE LITTLE,
RICKY GRAHAM,
FRANKLYN MORGAN,
NICK FOSTER,
ERIC CUTSHALL, and
TONI MECALF,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No.:

2:20-CV-25-DCLC-CRW

JUDGMENT ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion filed contemporaneously with this
order, Defendants’ motions to dismiss [Doc. 35 and 36] are GRANTED, and this action is
DISMISSED with prejudice.
Because the Court has CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion that any appeal from this
order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED
leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
s/Clifton L. Corker
United States District Judge
ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT:
John L. Medearis
Clerk of Court