Campbell v. Anderson County, TN et al

Filing 38

ORDER granting 32 plaintiff's Motion to Continue. The trial is continued (from February 6, 2009) to April 13, 2010. A final pretrial conference is set for April 7, 2010, at 1 p.m. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 16 is denied wit h leave to refile after the parties have completed discovery. Defendants' motion to exclude the affidavit of Scott Manning 25 is denied as moot. Plaintiff's Motion for leave to file the rebuttal affidavit of Scott Manning 28 is denied as moot. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on January 12, 2009. (AYB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ELIZA CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. ANDERSON COUNTY, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:06-CV-444 ( Phillips) ORDER This matter is before the court on the plaintiff's motion for continuance of the trial scheduled for February 9, 2009. As grounds for the motion, plaintiff states that the parties need additional time to complete discovery in the case. Defendants do not oppose the requested continuance [Doc. 36]. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for continuance [Doc. 32] is GRANTED. 1. 2. 3. The trial of this case is continued and shall commence on April 13, 2010. A final pretrial conference shall be held in this case on April 7, 2010 at 1:00 p.m. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. 16] is DENIED with leave to refile after the parties have completed discovery. Defendants' motion to exclude the affidavit of Scott Manning [Doc. 25] is DENIED AS MOOT. 4. 5. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file the rebuttal affidavit of Scott Manning [Doc. 28] is DENIED AS MOOT. All deadlines contained in the scheduling order previously entered in this case shall be adjusted to correspond to the new trial date. 6. IT IS SO ORDERED. ENTER: s/ Thomas W. Phillips United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?