Murray et al v. Harriman City, Tennessee et al
Filing
74
JUDGMENT, entered by the Clerk, whereby plaintiffs Bobby Murray and Loretta Murray take nothing, and that this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE on the merits. (copy mailed to pro se plaintiffs) (AYB)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE BOBBY MURRAY and LORETTA MURRAY, Plaintiffs, v. HARRIMAN CITY, JACK STOCKTON, KENNETH MYNATT, JOHN MAYES, JARRED WHITSON, KEITH STOUT, and DR. THOMAS BODUCH, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. 3:07-CV-482 (Phillips)
JUDGMENT ON DECISION BY THE COURT
This case came before the court on the motions for summary judgment by defendants. The Honorable Thomas W. Phillips, United States District Judge, having rendered a decision on the defendants' motions, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiffs Bobby Murray and Loretta Murray take nothing, and that this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE on the merits. Dated at Knoxville, Tennessee, this _____ day of February, 2010.
s/ Patricia L. McNutt Clerk of Court
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
