Stooksbury v. Ross et al

Filing 1054

ORDER finding as moot 1006 Motion to Stay; finding as moot 1007 Motion to Stay; finding as moot 1008 Motion to Expedite. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 10/04/2013. (KMK, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
ROBERT T. STOOKSBURY, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL L. ROSS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:09-CV-498
(VARLAN/GUYTON)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Rules of this Court,
and Standing Order 13-02.
Now before the Court is a Limited Intervening Petition [Doc. 1006], Motion for Limited
Stay [Doc. 1007], and Motion for Expedited Ruling [Doc. 1008], filed by RPM Assets, LLC, and
Mitchell E. Jones (the “Movants”). In these filings, the Movants request that the Court stay all
legal proceedings against receivership assets until the summary proceeding issue is resolved and
that the Court rule on the pending request for summary proceedings in an expedited manner.
[See Doc. 1006, 1007, 1008].
On September 12, 2013, the Court entered a Memorandum Opinion and Order ruling
upon the summary proceeding issue and directing that “all legal proceedings against receivership
assets are stayed until the conclusion of Stooksbury II, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.”
[Doc. 1035 at 24].

The Court finds that this ruling rendered the filings before the Court moot, and
accordingly, they [Docs. 1006, 1007, and 1008] are DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTER:
s/ H. Bruce Guyton
United States Magistrate Judge

2