Stooksbury v. Ross et al
ORDER granting 1162 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. The Receiver SHALL DISBURSE the $46,257.51 in funds described in the Petition, in a manner consistent with his suggested disbursement plan.Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 02/27/2014. (KAW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
ROBERT T. STOOKSBURY, JR.,
MICHAEL L. ROSS, et al.,
This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Rules of this Court,
and Standing Order 13-02.
Now before the Court is the Receiver’s Petition to Disburse Funds from Receivership
Estate [Doc. 1162], in which the Receiver moves the Court to enter an Order authorizing the
Receiver to disburse certain funds relating to dues assessed by various homeowners associations
and which were previously maintained by Judgment Debtor Michael L. Ross.
The Petition to Disburse Funds was filed on January 8, 2014. The Court finds that no
party or interested person or entity has responded in opposition to the Petition, and the time for
doing so has expired. See E.D. Tenn. L.R. 7.1. The Court may treat this failure to respond as
acquiescence to the relief sought. See E.D. Tenn. L.R. 7.2.
Moreover, the Court has reviewed the disbursement suggested by the Receiver, and the
Court finds that it is reasonable.
Accordingly, the Court finds that the Petition to Disburse Funds from the Receivership
Estate [Doc. 1162] is well-taken, and it is GRANTED. The Receiver SHALL DISBURSE the
$46,257.51 in funds described in the Petition, in a manner consistent with his suggested
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ H. Bruce Guyton
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?