Stooksbury v. Ross et al
ORDER that the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R 1587 , and hereby GRANTS the motion 1579 . The receiver is permitted to disburse the $7,111.50 requested as compensation for services and reimbursement for expenses for theperiod from June 1 to June 30, 2015. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 8/11/15. (ABF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
ROBERT T. STOOKSBURY, JR.,
MICHAEL L. ROSS, et al.,
This civil matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (the
“R&R”) entered by United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton on July 23, 2015
[Doc. 1587]. In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Guyton recommends that the receiver’s
Thirty-Seventh Interim Application to Pay Receiver’s Fees and Approve Receiver’s
Attorneys’ Fees and Costs [Doc. 1579] be granted. There have been no timely objections
to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any
objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72.
After a careful review of the matter, the Court is in agreement with Magistrate
Judge Guyton’s recommendations, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its
ruling. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R [Doc. 1587], and
hereby GRANTS the motion [Doc. 1579]. The receiver is permitted to disburse the
$7,111.50 requested as compensation for services and reimbursement for expenses for the
period from June 1 to June 30, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas A. Varlan
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?