Stooksbury v. Ross et al
ORDER: The Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R [Doc. 1644 ], and hereby DENIES AS MOOT the motion [Doc. 1603 ]. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 1/13/16. (JBR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
ROBERT T. STOOKSBURY, JR.,
MICHAEL L. ROSS, et al.,
This civil matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (the
“R&R”) entered by United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton on December 23,
2015 [Doc. 1644]. In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Guyton recommends that the motion to
compel compliance [Doc. 1603] be denied as moot.
There have been no timely
objections to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat
any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72.
After a careful review of the matter, the Court is in agreement with Magistrate
Judge Guyton’s recommendations, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its
ruling. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R [Doc. 1644], and
hereby DENIES AS MOOT the motion [Doc. 1603].
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas A. Varlan
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?