Stooksbury v. Ross et al
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 732 the Receiver's Third Interim Application to Pay Receiver's Fees and Approve Receiver's Attorneys' Fees and Costs, as set forth more fully in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on October 2, 2012. (AYB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
ROBERT T. STOOKSBURY, JR.,
MICHAEL L. ROSS, et al.,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Rules of this Court,
and the referral order of the District Judge. The Receiver has filed a Quarterly Report and Third
Interim Application to Pay Receiver’s Fees and Approve Receiver’s Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
The Receiver moves the Court to enter an Order authorizing payment of the Receiver’s
fees and expenses and to approve the reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred by Woolf,
McClane, Bright, Allen & Carpenter, PLLC (“Woolf, McClane”). Specifically, the Receiver
requests that the Court authorize payment of his expenses in the amount of $154.32 and fees for
services in the amount of $11,550.00. He also requests that the Court approve the expenses and
professional fees incurred by Woolf, McClane, which include expenses totaling $1,649.90 and
professional fees rendered in the amount of $120,665.50. The Receiver acknowledges that due
to the limited assets presently in the Receiver’s account, the payment of the fees and expenses to
Woolf, McClane will be delayed.1
The Receiver does not identify a certain time at which these fees and expenses will be paid, nor does he identify a
triggering event. The Court will expect the Receiver or a representative of Woolf, McClane to file a request for
distribution and reimbursement of these fees if and when additional assets are deposited in the Receiver’s account.
The Receiver has submitted extensive documentary evidence of: the work that has been
performed by the Receiver and his expenses [Doc. 732-1]; the assets located by the Receiver
[Doc. 732-2]; the account history for the Receiver’s account [Doc. 732-3]; a summary of the
professional and para-professional time expended [Doc. 732-4]; a summary of the expenses
incurred by Woolf, McClane [Tr. 732-5]; and detailed billing records from Woolf, McClane [Tr.
734]. The Court has reviewed the requested relief and this supporting documentation.
The Court finds that the fees and expenses requested are reasonable and should be
reimbursed. However, the Court finds that the expenses incurred by the Receiver and Woolf,
McClane shall receive first priority in payment. Thus, the Third Interim Application to Pay
Receiver’s Fees and Approve Receiver’s Attorneys’ Fees and Costs [Doc. 732] is GRANTED
IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. First, the Receiver’s request for expenses in the amount of $154.32 is
APPROVED and this amount SHALL BE PAID to the Receiver from the
2. Second, Woolf, McClane’s request for expenses in the amount of $1,649.90, is
APPROVED and this amount SHALL BE PAID to Woolf, McClane from the
3. The Receiver’s request for payment for services in the amount of $11,550.00 is
4. However, at this time, the Court will authorize a limited payment of $5,000, but
the Court ORDERS that the remaining $6,550.00 of the approved payment for
services will be a first-priority lien on an moneys that come into the Receiver’s
5. In addition, the professional fees submitted by Woof, McClane are APPROVED,
and the Receiver or a representative of Woolf, McClane may seek payment and
reimbursement of the same in the future.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ H. Bruce Guyton
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?