Cotterman-Henson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

Filing 41

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE theReport and Recommendation 39 under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, 30 is GRANTED, whereby Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees of $6,205.48, plus the filing fee of $350.00. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 4/10/14. (ADA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE PATRICIA COTTERMAN-HENSON, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:09-CV-533-PLR-CCS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This Social Security appeal is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge, C. Clifford Shirley [R. 39]. There have been no timely objections to the Report and Recommendation, and enough time has passed since the filing of the Report and Recommendation to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). After a careful review of this matter, the Court is in complete agreement with the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, be granted, and that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees of $6,205.48, plus the filing fee of $350.00. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). It is ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, [R. 30] is GRANTED, whereby Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees of $6,205.48, plus the filing fee of $350.00. IT IS SO ORDERED. Enter: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?