Singleton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

Filing 39

ORDER that the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation 38 . It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees Under the EAJA 33 is GRANTED and plaintiff is AWARDED a judgment in the amount of $3,132.07 for attorneys fees. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 9/18/12. (ABF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE RONALD D. SINGLETON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.: 3:09-CV-567 (VARLAN/GUYTON) ORDER This Social Security appeal is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton on August 16, 2012 [Doc. 38]. There have been no timely objections to the Report and Recommendation, and enough time has passed since the filing of the Report and Recommendation to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). In the Report and Recommendation, the magistrate judge recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Under Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 [Doc. 33] be granted, and that a judgment awarding plaintiff the amount of $3,132.07 for attorneys fees be entered. The Court has carefully reviewed this matter, including the underlying pleadings. The Court is in agreement with the magistrate judge’s recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 38]. Additionally, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Under Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 [Doc. 33] is GRANTED and plaintiff is hereby AWARDED a judgment in the amount of $3,132.07 for attorneys fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Thomas A. Varlan UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT s/ Debra C. Poplin CLERK OF COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?