Charles v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Filing 15

ORDER that the Report and Recommendation 12 is ACCEPTED IN WHOLE; Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 8 is DENIED; Defendant Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment 10 is GRANTED; and the decision of the defendant Commissioner in this case denying plaintiff's application for supplemental security income benefits is AFFIRMED. This case is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 7/28/11. (ABF)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
MARY E. CHARLES,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No.:

3:10-CV-134
(VARLAN/GUYTON)

ORDER
For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously with this
Order, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 12] entered by Magistrate Judge H. Bruce
Guyton is ACCEPTED IN WHOLE; plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 8]
is DENIED; Defendant Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 10] is
GRANTED; and the decision of the defendant Commissioner in this case denying plaintiff’s
application for supplemental security income benefits is AFFIRMED. This case is
DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Thomas A. Varlan
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE