Charles v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Filing
15
ORDER that the Report and Recommendation 12 is ACCEPTED IN WHOLE; Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 8 is DENIED; Defendant Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment 10 is GRANTED; and the decision of the defendant Commissioner in this case denying plaintiff's application for supplemental security income benefits is AFFIRMED. This case is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 7/28/11. (ABF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
MARY E. CHARLES,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No.:
3:10-CV-134
(VARLAN/GUYTON)
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously with this
Order, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 12] entered by Magistrate Judge H. Bruce
Guyton is ACCEPTED IN WHOLE; plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 8]
is DENIED; Defendant Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 10] is
GRANTED; and the decision of the defendant Commissioner in this case denying plaintiff’s
application for supplemental security income benefits is AFFIRMED. This case is
DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas A. Varlan
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?