Dunlap v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Filing 28

JUDGMENT ORDER overruling 25 plaintiff's objections to 24 the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, which is accepted in whole. The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 11 is DENIED; the defendant Com missioner's motion for summary judgment 22 is GRANTED; the defendant Commissioner's decision in this case denying plaintiff's application for benefits under the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED; and this case is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on May 20, 2011. (AYB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE BRAD H. DUNLAP JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:10-CV-136 (Phillips/Guyton) JUDGMENT ORDER For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion filed contemporaneously with this order, the objections to the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge filed by plaintiff [Doc. 25] are hereby OVERRULED. The report and recommendation [Doc. 24] is ACCEPTED IN WHOLE under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). IT IS ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the report and recommendation, which the court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. 11] is DENIED; the defendant Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. 22] is GRANTED; the defendant Commissioner’s decision in this case denying plaintiff’s application for benefits under the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED; and this case is DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. ENTER: s/ Thomas W. Phillips United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?