Rogers v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Filing 16

FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER, entered by the Clerk, overruling the objections to the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge filed by plaintiff. The report and recommendation 13 is ACCEPTED IN WHOLE. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 7 is DENIED; the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment 11 is GRANTED; the Commissioner's denial of Plaintiff's application for benefits under the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED; and this case is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on September 26, 2011. (AYB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE MARTIN RANDY ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:10-CV-314 (Phillips/Shirley) FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion filed contemporaneously with this order, the objections to the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge filed by plaintiff [Doc. 14] are hereby OVERRULED. The report and recommendation [Doc. 13] is ACCEPTED IN WHOLE under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). IT IS ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the report and recommendation, which the court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 7] is DENIED; the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 11] is GRANTED; the Commissioner’s denial of Plaintiff’s application for benefits under the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED; and this case is DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. ENTER: Entered as a judgment. s/ Patricia L. McNutt PATRICIA L. McNUTT CLERK OF COURT s/ Thomas W. Phillips United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?