Faulkner v. Osbourne et al
Filing
83
JUDGMENT, entered by the Clerk, the Plaintiff David Chester Faulkner recover nothing. The Plaintiff's medical claim against Ronald Higgs, M.D., be dismissed with prejudice. The Plaintiff's claim against Defendants David Osborne, Bill King, Ginger Davidson, Fred James, and Dan Walker, be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. (mailed to Mr. Faulkner) (AYB)
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Eastern District of Tennessee
__________ District of __________
David Chester Faulkner
Plaintiff
v.
Warden David R. Osborne, et al.
Defendant
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-154
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
the plaintiff (name)
defendant (name)
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
%, along with costs.
dollars ($
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
interest at the rate of
the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
✔ other:
the Plaintiff David Chester Faulkner recover nothing. The Plaintiff's medical claim against Ronald Higgs,
M.D., be dismissed with prejudice. The Plaintiff's claim against Defendants David Osborne, Bill King, Ginger
Davidson, Fred James, and Dan Walker, be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust his
.
administrative remedies.
This action was (check one):
tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
tried by Judge
was reached.
✔ decided by Judge
presiding, and the jury has
without a jury and the above decision
H. Bruce Guyton
on a motion for
for summary judgment filed by Ronald Higgs, M.D., and a motion to dismiss filed by Defendants David Osborne,
Bill King, Ginger Davidson, Fred James, and Dan Walker.
Date:
03/13/2012
CLERK OF COURT
s/ A. Brush
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?