Faulkner v. Osbourne et al

Filing 83

JUDGMENT, entered by the Clerk, the Plaintiff David Chester Faulkner recover nothing. The Plaintiff's medical claim against Ronald Higgs, M.D., be dismissed with prejudice. The Plaintiff's claim against Defendants David Osborne, Bill King, Ginger Davidson, Fred James, and Dan Walker, be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. (mailed to Mr. Faulkner) (AYB)

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Eastern District of Tennessee __________ District of __________ David Chester Faulkner Plaintiff v. Warden David R. Osborne, et al. Defendant ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-154 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment %, along with costs. dollars ($ %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of interest at the rate of the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . ✔ other: the Plaintiff David Chester Faulkner recover nothing. The Plaintiff's medical claim against Ronald Higgs, M.D., be dismissed with prejudice. The Plaintiff's claim against Defendants David Osborne, Bill King, Ginger Davidson, Fred James, and Dan Walker, be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust his . administrative remedies. This action was (check one): tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. tried by Judge was reached. ✔ decided by Judge presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision H. Bruce Guyton on a motion for for summary judgment filed by Ronald Higgs, M.D., and a motion to dismiss filed by Defendants David Osborne, Bill King, Ginger Davidson, Fred James, and Dan Walker. Date: 03/13/2012 CLERK OF COURT s/ A. Brush Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?