Harris v. City of Oak Ridge et al

Filing 27

ORDER denying 25 Defendants' Motion to Reconsider, or in the Alternative, [for] Permission to File an Interlocutory Appeal. Signed by District Judge Tena Campbell on October 24, 2012. (AYB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE THE ESTATE OF RODNEY EUGENE HARRIS and PATRICIA HARRIS, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF RODNEY EUGENE HARRIS, Plaintiffs, No. 3:11-cv-385 vs. (Campbell/Guyton) CITY OF OAK RIDGE, et al., Defendants. ORDER The Defendants filed a Motion to Reconsider, or in the Alternative, [for] Permission to File an Interlocutory Appeal (Docket No. 25). The Defendants ask the court to reconsider its September 11, 2012 Order (Docket No. 23), or to allow them the opportunity to appeal the order to the Sixth Circuit. The court, having reviewed its September 11, 2012 Order, the Defendants’ motion to reconsider, and relevant case law, stands by its original ruling. Accordingly, the motion to reconsider or for permission to appeal is DENIED. SO ORDERED this 24th day of October, 2012. BY THE COURT: TENA CAMPBELL U.S. District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?