Lincoln Memorial University Duncan School of Law v. American Bar Association (TV1)
Filing
60
NOTICE by American Bar Association of Status Report (Vogel, Howard)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
KNOXVILLE DIVISION
LINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY
DUNCAN SCHOOL OF LAW,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:11-CV-608
Hon. Thomas A. Varlan
Magistrate Judge C. Clifford Shirley
DEFENDANT AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION’S STATUS REPORT
Pursuant to this Court’s order of May 9, 2012 (Doc. 59), defendant American Bar
Association (“ABA”) submits this status report regarding the decision by the Council of the
ABA Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar (the “Section”) following the
remand by the Appeals Panel of certain issues in connection with the application for provisional
approval filed by plaintiff Lincoln Memorial University Duncan School of Law (the “School”).
On July 5, 2012, the Council informed the School by letter (“July 5 Letter”) that, after
consideration consistent with the Appeals Panel’s instructions, the Council affirmed its decision
to deny the School’s application for provisional approval. A notice of the Council’s action was
made public on that date pursuant to ABA Internal Operating Practice 5,1 but the July 5 Letter
itself remains confidential under ABA Rule of Procedure 25.
1
The required notice to the public is located at
www.americanbar.org/groups/legal_education.html.
In accordance with ABA Rule of Procedure 10(a), the School has the right of appeal to
the Appeals Panel of an adverse decision of the Council denying provisional approval. Although
Rule 10(a) does not specify that this right includes a subsequent appeal following an adverse
decision on remand, neither does it specifically preclude such an appeal. The Council therefore
concluded that the present decision on remand is an adverse decision of the Council within the
meaning of Rule 10(a), and the School may appeal the Council’s present decision to the Appeals
Panel, with such appeal limited to the basis for the Council’s present decision, as set forth in the
Council’s July 5 Letter. Under ABA Rule of Procedure 10(b), the School’s written appeal, if
any, must be filed with the Consultant within 30 days after the date of the Council’s July 5 Letter
and must conform to the requirements of Rule 10. Unless such an appeal is filed by the School
with the Consultant no later than Monday, August 6, 2012 (since the thirtieth day is on a
Saturday), the Council’s present decision on remand will become effective on that date, or on
such earlier date that the Consultant receives written notification from the School that the School
will not file an appeal. Should the School elect to file such an appeal, the Council’s decision on
remand will be stayed pending the outcome of the specific procedures for Appeals Panel review,
as outlined in Rule 10.
In its order dated April 2, 2012 (Doc. 56), this Court stayed the above-captioned litigation
pending the Appeals Panel’s decision, and in its order dated May 9, 2012, the Court continued
that stay pending resolution of the remanded issues by the Council. The Court further ordered
the ABA to file this updated status report with the Court on or before July 15, 2012, addressing
the status of the remand.
At this time, the ABA believes that continuing the stay of the litigation is appropriate
2
because the administrative process remains ongoing, with the School having the option to appeal
the Council’s decision on remand to the Appeals Panel on or before August 6, 2012. The ABA
therefore suggests that the ABA file an updated status report with the Court on or before August
15, 2012.
Dated: July 5, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
Patricia J. Larson*
Stephanie Giggetts*
American Bar Association
321 N. Clark Street
Chicago, IL 60654
(312) 988-5000
By: s/ Howard H. Vogel
.
Howard H. Vogel (001015)
Jeffrey R. Thompson (20310)
P. Alexander Vogel (023944)
O’Neil, Parker & Williamson, PLLC
7610 Gleason Drive, Suite 200
Knoxville, TN 37919
(865) 546-7190
Anne E. Rea*
Michael P. Doss*
Linda R. Friedlieb*
Sidley Austin LLP
One South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60603
(312) 853-7000
Attorneys for Defendant
*Pro hac vice
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on July 5, 2012, I properly served all parties by operation of the Court’s
electronic filing system to all parties indicated on the electronic filing receipt and U.S. Mail.
By:
3
s/ Howard H. Vogel (0001015)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?