Tipton v. Johnson

Filing 22

ORDER, entered as a Judgment by the Clerk, in which Petitioner's pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [Doc. 1], is hereby DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED. Furthermore, for the reasons given in the memorandum opinion, any timely appeal taken from this action will be treated as an application for a Certificate of Appealability, which is herebyDENIED. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on October 15, 2015. C/M (AYB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
MICHELLE TIPTON,
Petitioner,
v.
VICKI FREEMAN, Warden,
Tennessee Prison for Women,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No.: 3:12-CV-207-TAV-CCS

ORDER
For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion entered contemporaneously
with this order, Petitioner’s pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed under 28
U.S.C. § 2254 [Doc. 1], is hereby DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED. Furthermore,
for the reasons given in the memorandum opinion, any timely appeal taken from this
action will be treated as an application for a Certificate of Appealability, which is hereby
DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Thomas A. Varlan
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT
s/ Debra C. Poplin
CLERK OF COURT