Rattan v. Nichols et al

Filing 28

JUDGMENT on Decision by the Court, entered by the Clerk, that the plaintiff Arun Rattan take nothing, that Plaintiff's claims be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and that the Defendants recover of the Plaintiff their costs of action. (mailed to Mr. Rattan) (AYB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ARUN RATTAN, Plaintiff, v. RANDY NICHOLS, KNOX COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:12-CV-325 (PHILLIPS) JUDGMENT ON DECISION BY THE COURT This case came before the Court on the Motions to Dismiss filed by the Defendants [Doc.11]. The Honorable Thomas W. Phillips, United States District Judge, having rendered a decision on the Defendants’ motions, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff Arun Rattan take nothing, that Plaintiff’s claims be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and that the Defendants recover of the Plaintiff their costs of action. 6th Dated at Knoxville, Tennessee, this _____ day of March, 2013. s/ Debra C. Poplin Clerk of Court I.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?