LNV Corporation v. Gebhardt (TV3)

Filing 71

ORDER denying 64 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 5/28/14. (copy mailed) (KMK, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE LNV CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CATHERINE GEBHARDT, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:12-CV-468-TAV-HBG MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Rules of this Court, and Standing Order 13-02. On May 14, 2014, Defendant filed an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [Doc. 64], in which she moves the Court to allow her to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Pursuant to Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, a party who moves to be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal must demonstrate through a detailed financial statement that the party is unable to pay or to give security for the fees and costs of the appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. In her application, the Defendant indicates that she owns the home in which she has resided for the last twelve years. [Doc. 64 at 2]. She does not state the full address of this home. [Id. at 2]. She lists 3753 Thomas Cross Road, the real property that is subject to the note and mortgage at issue in this case, separately, and it is not clear from the application whether the Defendant resides at 3753 Thomas Cross Road. [Id. at 2-3]. Regardless, Defendant does not give any value for the real property on Thomas Cross Road, nor does she indicate whether she has any equity in this real property. Based upon the foregoing, the Court finds that the Defendant has not demonstrated that she should be permitted to proceed without paying the $500 filing fee or other costs. Accordingly, the Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [Doc. 64] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. ENTER: United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?