CIT Small Business Lending Corporation v. Advanced Dental Concepts, P.C. et al

Filing 18

ORDER granting 16 Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment; and on or before Friday, April 25, 2014, the Defendants SHALL SHOW CAUSE as to why this Court should not enter a judgment against both defendants jointl y and severally in the amount of $561,054.42 plus a per diem charge of $78.18 from September 16, 2013 until the date of the judgment, at the legal rate of interest in effect as of the date of this judgment, compounded daily and annually, until paid in full. Signed by District Judge Karen K Caldwell on April 18, 2014. (AYB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE CIT SMALL BUSINESS LENDING CORPORATION, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-474 Plaintiff, V. ORDER ADVANCED DENTAL CONCEPTS, P.C., a Tennessee professional corporation, and FREDRICO A. DIXON, III, a Tennessee individual, Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff CIT Small Business Lending’s motion for summary judgment against Fredrico A. Dixon, III. (DE 16). Dixon has not responded to CIT’s motion for summary judgment. The Court has already entered summary judgment in favor of CIT against Advanced Dental Concepts, P.C. (DE 14). Pursuant to the Eastern District of Tennessee Local Rule 7.2, “Failure to respond to a motion may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the relief sought.” Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (DE 16) is GRANTED; and 2. On or before Friday, April 25, 2014, the Defendants SHALL SHOW CAUSE as to why this Court should not enter a judgment against both defendants jointly and severally in the amount of $561,054.42 plus a per diem charge of $78.18 from September 16, 2013 until the date of the judgment, at the legal rate of interest in effect as of the date of this judgment, compounded daily and annually, until paid in full. This 18th day of April, 2014.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?