Stooksbury v. Ross
ORDER ACCEPTING IN WHOLE 513 Report and Recommendations. That plaintiff's 492 Motion for Default Judgment Against the Ross Entities is GRANTED; That the Ross Entities are ADJUDGED responsible for fraud, civil conspiracy, and unjust enrichment, and are also found in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); and That judgment in the total amount of $1,516,431.79 be awarded to plaintiff, plus costs and interest. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 7/31/2017. (copies mailed to the Ross Entity Defendants and Evelyn and Michael Ross at 334 Royal Oaks Dr., Maryville, TN 37801) (KMK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
ROBERT T. STOOKSBURY,
MICHAEL L. ROSS, et al.,
This civil matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation entered by
United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton, on July 3, 2017 (the “R&R”) [Doc. 513].
In the R&R, Judge Guyton recommends that plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgement
Against the Ross Entities [Doc. 492] be granted. There have been no timely objections to
the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections
as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72.
After a careful review of the matter, the Court is in agreement with Magistrate Judge
Guyton’s recommendations, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling. As
such, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R [Doc. 513]. The Court hereby orders
That plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment Against the Ross Entities1
[Doc. 492] is GRANTED;
The specific Ross entities are identified in the R&R [Doc. 513 pp. 2–3].
That the Ross Entities are ADJUDGED responsible for fraud, civil
conspiracy, and unjust enrichment, and are also found in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 1962(d); and
That judgment in the total amount of $1,516,431.79 be awarded to plaintiff,
plus costs and interest.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas A. Varlan
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT
s/ Debra C. Poplin
CLERK OF COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?