Stooksbury v. Ross

Filing 522

ORDER ACCEPTING IN WHOLE 513 Report and Recommendations. That plaintiff's 492 Motion for Default Judgment Against the Ross Entities is GRANTED; That the Ross Entities are ADJUDGED responsible for fraud, civil conspiracy, and unjust enrichment, and are also found in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); and That judgment in the total amount of $1,516,431.79 be awarded to plaintiff, plus costs and interest. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 7/31/2017. (copies mailed to the Ross Entity Defendants and Evelyn and Michael Ross at 334 Royal Oaks Dr., Maryville, TN 37801) (KMK)

Download PDF
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ROBERT T. STOOKSBURY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL L. ROSS, et al., Defendants. No.: 3:12-CV-548-TAV-HBG ORDER This civil matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton, on July 3, 2017 (the “R&R”) [Doc. 513]. In the R&R, Judge Guyton recommends that plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgement Against the Ross Entities [Doc. 492] be granted. There have been no timely objections to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. After a careful review of the matter, the Court is in agreement with Magistrate Judge Guyton’s recommendations, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling. As such, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R [Doc. 513]. The Court hereby orders the following: 1. That plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment Against the Ross Entities1 [Doc. 492] is GRANTED;                                                              1 The specific Ross entities are identified in the R&R [Doc. 513 pp. 2–3]. 2. That the Ross Entities are ADJUDGED responsible for fraud, civil conspiracy, and unjust enrichment, and are also found in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); and 3. That judgment in the total amount of $1,516,431.79 be awarded to plaintiff, plus costs and interest. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Thomas A. Varlan CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT s/ Debra C. Poplin CLERK OF COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?