Frazier v. Jackson et al

Filing 72

JUDGMENT that summary judgment be, and is hereby, ENTERED IN DEFENDANTS' FAVOR AGAINST PLAINTIFFS, and that Plaintiffs' Complaint 1 , First Amended Complaint 3 , and Second Amended Complaint 28 be, and are hereby, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge William O Bertelsman on July 19, 2013. (AYB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NORTHERN DIVISION AT KNOXVILLE

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12cv0564 (WOB-HBG)
DONNA FRAZIER, Individually and
As Personal Representative of the
Estate of JOSEPH FRAZIER
VS.

PLAINTIFF

JUDGMENT

SIDNEY JACKSON; KEVIN GRAHAM;
JACKSON, FOSTER, & RICHARDSON, LLC,
successor in interest,
JACKSON, FOSTER, & GRAHAM;
BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, METHVIN,
PORTIS, & MILES, PC;
MICHAEL PADWAY AND ASSOCIATES; and
MICHAEL PADWAY

DEFENDANTS

Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered
concurrently herewith,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that summary judgment be,
and is hereby, ENTERED IN DEFENDANTS’ FAVOR AGAINST PLAINTIFFS,
and that Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Doc. 1), First Amended Complaint
(Doc. 3), and Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 28) be, and are
hereby, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

This 19th day of July, 2013.