Frazier v. Jackson et al

Filing 82

JUDGMENT denying as moot 79 plaintiff's verified opposed motion to perpetuate certain testimony. Signed by District Judge William O Bertelsman on August 18, 2014. (AYB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NORTHERN DIVISION AT KNOXVILLE
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12cv0564 (WOB-HBG)
DONNA FRAZIER, Individually and
As Personal Representative of the
Estate of JOSEPH FRAZIER
VS.

PLAINTIFF

JUDGMENT

SIDNEY JACKSON; KEVIN GRAHAM;
JACKSON, FOSTER, & RICHARDSON, LLC,
successor in interest,
JACKSON, FOSTER, & GRAHAM;
BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, METHVIN,
PORTIS, & MILES, PC;
MICHAEL PADWAY AND ASSOCIATES; and
MICHAEL PADWAY

DEFENDANTS

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s verified
opposed motion to perpetuate certain testimony (Doc. 79), and
this motion having been rendered moot by plaintiff’s failure to
file a petition for writ of certiorari within the time allowed,
and being otherwise sufficiently advised,
IT IS ORDERED that the above motion (Doc. 79) be, and is
hereby, DENIED AS MOOT.
This 18th day of August, 2014.