Carroll et al v. CMH Homes Inc. et al
Filing
121
JUDGMENT, entered by the Clerk, 1) that Defendant's Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b) 100 is DENIED; 2) that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 101 is GRANTED and Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3) that Defendant's Counterclaim is DISMISSED AS MOOT; 4) that all scheduled proceedings are CONTINUED GENERALLY; 5) that all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT; and 6) that this Order is FINAL AND APPEALABLE and THERE IS NO JUST CAUSE FOR DELAY. Signed by District Judge Joseph M Hood on June 4, 2013. (AYB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
KEVIN CARROLL, et. al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CMH HOMES, INC., et. al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.
3:13-cv-141-JMH
JUDGMENT
***
In accordance with the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and
Order of even date and entered contemporaneously herewith,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
(1)
that
Defendant’s
Motion
for
Entry
of
Judgment
under Rule 54(b) [D.E. 100] is DENIED;
(2) that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [D.E.
101] is GRANTED and Plaintiffs’ claims are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE;
(3)
that
Defendant’s
that
all
Counterclaim
is
DISMISSED
AS
MOOT;
(4)
scheduled
proceedings
are
CONTINUED
GENERALLY;
(5)
that all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT; and
(6)
that this Order is FINAL AND APPEALABLE and THERE
IS NO JUST CAUSE FOR DELAY.
This the 4th day of June, 2013.
ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT
s/ Debra C. Poplin
CLERK OF COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?