Taylor v. Kidwell

Filing 71

ORDER that the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation [3:13-CV-369, doc. 70; 3:13-CV-370, doc. 66; 3:13-CV-371, doc. 66; 3:13-CV-372, doc. 66] under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, which the court adopts and incorporates into this ruling, plaintiffs Request for a restraining order by the court [sic] [3:13-CV-369, doc. 58; 3:13-CV-370, doc. 54; 3:13-CV-371, doc. 54; 3:13-CV-372, doc. 54] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge R Leon Jordan on 5/19/15. (c/m) Associated Cases: 3:13-cv-00369-RLJ-HBG, 3:13-cv-00370-RLJ-HBG, 3:13-cv-00371-RLJ-HBG, 3:13-cv-00372-RLJ-HBG (ABF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
RONALD TAYLOR,
Plaintiff,
v.
BRADLEY KIDWELL,
Defendant.
RONALD TAYLOR,
Plaintiff,
v.
JASON STOKES,
Defendant.
RONALD TAYLOR,
Plaintiff,
v.
RICHARD SCARBROUGH,
Defendant.
RONALD TAYLOR,
Plaintiff,
v.
JASON LAWSON,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:13-CV-369

No. 3:13-CV-370

No. 3:13-CV-371

No. 3:13-CV-372

ORDER
This case is before the court on the Report and Recommendation [3:13-CV369, doc. 70; 3:13-CV-370, doc. 66; 3:13-CV-371, doc. 66; 3:13-CV-372, doc. 66] filed by
United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton on April 28, 2015. There have been no
timely objections filed to this Report and Recommendation, and enough time has passed to
treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
Magistrate Judge Guyton recommends that plaintiff’s “Request for a restraining order by
the court [sic]” [3:13-CV-369, doc. 58; 3:13-CV-370, doc. 54; 3:13-CV-371, doc. 54; 3:13CV-372, doc. 54] be denied.
After careful review, the court is in complete agreement with Magistrate
Judge Guyton’s conclusion that plaintiff’s motion should be denied. The court therefore
ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation [3:13-CV-369, doc. 70; 3:13CV-370, doc. 66; 3:13-CV-371, doc. 66; 3:13-CV-372, doc. 66] under 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

For the reasons stated in the Report and

Recommendation, which the court adopts and incorporates into this ruling, plaintiff’s
“Request for a restraining order by the court [sic]” [3:13-CV-369, doc. 58; 3:13-CV-370,
doc. 54; 3:13-CV-371, doc. 54; 3:13-CV-372, doc. 54] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTER:
s/ Leon Jordan
United States District Judge
2