Zirkle v. Donahue

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM with order to follow.Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 8/7/2013. (AWH, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE DAVID ZIRKLE, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL DONAHUE, Warden, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:13-cv-412 Judge Curtis L. Collier MEMORANDUM This pro se petition for the writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 was filed in forma pauperis in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Eastern Division, and transferred to this Court. Petitioner challenges his convictions, from the early 1990's, for first degree murder and especially aggravated robbery in the Criminal Court for Sevier County, Tennessee. Petitioner previously filed habeas petitions in this Court, each of which was dismissed as untimely. See David Zirkle v. Joe Easterling, Warden, Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-269 (E.D. Tenn. July 12, 2012) (order dismissing habeas petition as untimely); David Zirkle v. Howard Carlton, Warden, Civil Action No. 3:03-cv308 (E.D. Tenn. June 12, 2003) (order dismissing habeas petition as untimely). For the reasons set forth in the Court's prior orders, the current habeas petition will likewise be DISMISSED as untimely. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases In The United States District Courts. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Rule 22(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Court will CERTIFY that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous. See Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Court will further DENY petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. AN APPROPRIATE ORDER WILL ENTER. /s/ CURTIS L. COLLIER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?