Adkisson et al v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (TV1)
Filing
527
ORDER: the parties shall complete all fact discovery in each of these cases by November 13, 2020. This deadline will not be extended absent extraordinary circumstances. In light of this firm deadline, the Court will amend its standard procedure for the resolution of discovery disputes: If a discovery dispute arises, the parties are DIRECTED to confer with United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton. The Court will set a deadline for expert discovery in a future order. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on May 12, 2020. (AYB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
GREG ADKISSON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
KEVIN THOMPSON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
JOE CUNNINGHAM, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
BILL ROSE,
Plaintiff,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
CRAIG WILKINSON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
ANGIE SHELTON, as wife and next of kin
on behalf of Mike Shelton, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
JOHNNY CHURCH,
Plaintiff,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No.:
3:13-CV-505-TAV-HBG
Lead case consolidated with
No.:
3:13-CV-666-TAV-HBG
as consolidated with
No.:
3:14-CV-20-TAV-HBG
No.:
3:15-CV-17-TAV-HBG
No.:
3:15-CV-274-TAV-HBG
No.:
3:15-CV-420-TAV-HBG
No.:
3:15-CV-460-TAV-HBG
Case 3:13-cv-00505-TAV-HBG Document 527 Filed 05/12/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 17367
DONALD R. VANGUILDER, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
JUDY IVENS, as sister and next of kin,
on behalf of JEAN NANCE, deceased,
Plaintiff,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
PAUL RANDY FARROW,
Plaintiff,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No.:
3:15-CV-462-TAV-HBG
No.:
3:16-CV-635-TAV-HBG
No.:
3:16-CV-636-TAV-HBG
ORDER
Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Status Report Regarding Discovery Relating to
Individual Plaintiffs [Doc. 522]. Having reviewed this report and considered the parties’
arguments set forth therein, the Court hereby ORDERS the parties to complete all fact
discovery in each of these cases by November 13, 2020. This deadline will not be extended
absent extraordinary circumstances. In light of this firm deadline, the Court will amend its
standard procedure for the resolution of discovery disputes: If a discovery dispute arises,
the parties are DIRECTED to confer with United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton.1
1.
The parties are advised that delays occasioned by discovery disputes would not constitute
an extraordinary circumstance for purposes of this Order, nor would the press of other business or
work-related demands alone.
2
Case 3:13-cv-00505-TAV-HBG Document 527 Filed 05/12/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 17368
The Court will set a deadline for expert discovery in a future order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas A. Varlan
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
3
Case 3:13-cv-00505-TAV-HBG Document 527 Filed 05/12/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 17369
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?