Adkisson et al v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (TV1)

Filing 680

ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion to Withdraw the Subpoena [Doc. 678 ] is GRANTED, and the Subpoena of Tom D. Kilgore is WITHDRAWN. Therefore, Kilgore's Motion to Quash [Doc. 645 ] is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 11/5/20. Associated Cases: 3:13-cv-00505-TAV-HBG et al. (JBR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
GREG ADKISSON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.

KEVIN THOMPSON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.

JOE CUNNINGHAM, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.

BILL ROSE,
Plaintiff,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.

CRAIG WILKINSON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.

ANGIE SHELTON, as wife and next of
kin on behalf of Mike Shelton, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No.: 3:13-CV-505-TAV-HBG

Lead Case Consolidated with

No.: 3:13-CV-666-TAV-HBG

as consolidated with

No.: 3:14-CV-20-TAV-HBG

No.: 3:15-CV-17-TAV-HBG

No.: 3:15-CV-274-TAV-HBG

No.: 3:15-CV-420-TAV-HBG

JOHNNY CHURCH,
Plaintiff,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

DONALD R. VANGUILDER, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.

JUDY IVENS, as sister and next of kin,
on behalf of JEAN NANCE, deceased,
Plaintiff,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.

PAUL RANDY FARROW,
Plaintiff,
v.
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.

No.: 3:15-CV-460-TAV-HBG

No.: 3:15-CV-462-TAV-HBG

No.: 3:16-CV-635-TAV-HBG

No.: 3:16-CV-636-TAV-HBG

ORDER
This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Rules of this Court, and
Standing Order 13-02.
Now before the Court is the Motion to Quash [Doc. 645], filed by non-party Tom D. Kilgore
(“Kilgore”) on October 21, 2020. Kilgore seeks to quash the deposition subpoena issued to and
served on him by Plaintiff’s counsel, stating that subjecting him to a deposition on irrelevant issues
relating to Phase II upon which he has limited knowledge would be unduly burdensome.
Additionally, Kilgore includes an affidavit wherein he states that he recently suffered a stroke on
January 29, 2019, which has impacted his memory. [Doc. 646].
2

Plaintiffs subsequently filed a Motion to Withdraw Subpoena of Tom D. Kilgore [Doc. 678],
as well as a Notice [Doc. 679] that they do not oppose the Motion to Quash [Doc. 645]. Accordingly,
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Withdraw the Subpoena [Doc. 678] is GRANTED, and the Subpoena of Tom
D. Kilgore is WITHDRAWN. 1 Therefore, Kilgore’s Motion to Quash [Doc. 645] is DENIED AS
MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTER:

United States Magistrate Judge

1

The Court notes that the executed subpoena of Kilgore was not filed by Plaintiffs before
the Court. See [Doc. 647-1].
3