Taylor v. Kidwell

Filing 4

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Motion for Discovery in case 3:13-mc-00011-RLJ-HBG; denying Motion for Discovery in case 3:13-mc-00012-RLJ-HBG; denying Motion for Discovery in case 3:13-mc-00013-RLJ-HBG; denying Motion for Discovery in case 3:13-mc-00014-RLJ-HBG. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 10/16/14. (JBR) (c/m) Modified text on 10/16/2014 (JBR).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
RONALD TAYLOR,
Plaintiff,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

v.
JASON STOKES,
Defendant.

RONALD TAYLOR,
Plaintiff,
v.
RICHARD SCARBROUGH,
Defendant.

RONALD TAYLOR,
Plaintiff,
v.
JASON LAWSON,
Defendant.

No. 3:13-MC-13-RLJ-HBG

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

RONALD TAYLOR,
Plaintiff,

No. 3:13-MC-12-RLJ-HBG

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

BRADLEY KIDWELL,
Defendant.

No. 3:13-MC-11-RLJ-HBG

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

v.

No. 3:13-MC-14-RLJ-HBG

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
These cases are before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Rules of this
Court, and Standing Order 13-02.

Now before the Court is a filing by Plaintiff Ronald Taylor, which, in substance, is a
request for discovery. The Court finds that all of the matters in which Mr. Taylor has filed this
request for discovery have been dismissed. The Court further finds that Mr. Taylor did not
obtain a judgment in any of these matters and has not shown good cause for permitting postjudgment discovery pursuant to Rule 69 of the Federal Rules of Discovery.
Accordingly, the Court finds that the Plaintiff’s request for discovery, filed October 14,
2014, is not well-taken, and it is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTER:

United States Magistrate Judge