Williams v. Sexton et al
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM; Plaintiff has failed to amend his complaint. Therefore, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. AN APPROPRIATE ORDER WILL ENTER. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 10/9/14. (CNM, ) Copy of Memorandum mailed to Plaintiff.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
DANIEL L. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
DAVID SEXTON, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No.: 3:14-cv-62-HSM-CCS
MEMORANDUM
This is a pro se prisoner's civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April
21, 2014, plaintiff was given twenty (20) days to amend his complaint to properly state a
claim against the defendants listed in his complaint or his action would be dismissed.
Plaintiff's motion for additional time was granted on July 7, 2014, and he was given an
additional twenty (20) days from that date to amend his complaint. Plaintiff has failed to
amend his complaint.
Therefore, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under 42
U.S.C. § 1983, and for plaintiff's failure to prosecute and to comply with the orders of
this Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Jourdan v. Jabe, 951 F.2d 108 (6th Cir. 1991). The
Court will CERTIFY that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith
and would be totally frivolous. See Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
AN APPROPRIATE ORDER WILL ENTER.
/s/ Harry S. Mattice, Jr._______
HARRY S. MATTICE, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?