Gibson v. Social Security Administration

Filing 17

JUDGMENT ORDER that Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment 11 is GRANTED; the Defendant Commissioners motion for summary judgment 13 is DENIED. This case is REMANDED for proper consideration of the plaintiffs subjective complaints of pain regarding her fibromyalgia and a reassessment of the plaintiffs RFC based on proper consideration of the plaintiffs subjective complaints of pain. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 12/30/14. (ABF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Robin D. Gibson, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3:14-CV-137-PLR-HBG JUDGMENT ORDER For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously with this Judgment Order, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [R. 15] is ACCEPTED IN WHOLE under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). IT IS ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that the Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [R. 11] is GRANTED; the Defendant Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment [R. 13] is DENIED. This case is REMANDED for proper consideration of the plaintiff’s subjective complaints of pain regarding her fibromyalgia and a reassessment of the plaintiff’s RFC based on proper consideration of the plaintiff’s subjective complaints of pain. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT s/ Debra C. Poplin CLERK OF COURT 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?