Quigley v. Mondelez Global, LLC et al (PLR1)

Filing 4

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting plaintiff's 3 Motion to transfer this matter to the Middle District of Tennessee. This matter is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Northeastern Division. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 8/8/14. (ADA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE RACHELL LYNN QUIGLEY, Plaintiff, v. MONDELEZ INTERNTIONAL INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.: 3:14-CV-335-PLR-HBG MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on the plaintiff’s motion to transfer this matter to the Middle District of Tennessee [R. 3]. In support of the motion, plaintiff states that counsel inadvertently and mistakenly filed the complaint in the Eastern District of Tennessee, Knoxville Division. The motor vehicle accident at issue took place in Cumberland County, Tennessee, so the case should properly be before the Middle District of Tennessee, Northeastern Division. Plaintiff further states that the Clerk has not issued summons, and defendants have not been served with process. 28 U.S.C. § 1404 permits transfer of a case for the convenience of parties and witnesses, and in the interest of justice. The district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought or to any district or division to which all parties have consented. Id. For the good cause stated by plaintiff, the court finds that this action should be transferred to the Middle District of Tennessee, Northeastern Division, and the plaintiff’s motion for transfer [R. 3] is hereby GRANTED. This matter is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Northeastern Division, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?