Mullins v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (PLR2)
Filing
18
ORDER that the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). It is ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that plaintiff Bill Mullinss motion for judgment on the pleadings 13 is DENIED; the Commissioners motion for summary judgment 15 is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 7/7/15. (ABF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
Bill Mullins, Jr.,
Plaintiff,
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:14-CV-352-PLR-CCS
Memorandum Opinion
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by United States
Magistrate Judge, C. Clifford Shirley, Jr. [R. 17]. There have been no timely objections to the
Report and Recommendation, and enough time has passed since the filing of the Report and
Recommendation to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);
Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).
After a careful review of this matter, the Court is in complete agreement with the
Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that the plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings [R. 13]
should be denied, and the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment [R. 15] be granted.
Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation under 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). It is ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the Report
and Recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that plaintiff Bill
Mullins’s motion for judgment on the pleadings [R. 13] is DENIED; the Commissioner’s motion
for summary judgment [R. 15] is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?