Owens v. McCallister

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve copies of the petition and this Memorandum and Order upon the respondent and the Attorney General for The State of Tennessee. Since it does not plainly appear from the face of t he petition that it should be summarily dismissed, the respondent is hereby ORDERED to answer or otherwise respond to the petition within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 11/12/14. (copy mailed along with Petition to Respondent and TN Attorney General) (JBR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE TOMMY JOE OWENS, Petitioner, v. GERALD MCALLISTER, Warden, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.: 3:14-cv-529-TAV-HBG MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This attorney-filed petition for a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenges the petitioner’s 2005 Campbell County, Tennessee convictions for three counts of aggravated child abuse and one count of aggravated child neglect, for which he received an effective sentence of ninety-five (95) years’ imprisonment. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve copies of the petition and this Memorandum and Order upon the respondent and the Attorney General for The State of Tennessee. Since it does not plainly appear from the face of the petition that it should be summarily dismissed, the respondent is hereby ORDERED to answer or otherwise respond to the petition within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases In The United States District Courts. The respondent should specifically address whether the petition was timely filed and whether the petitioner has exhausted his available state court remedies. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(d), 2254(b). ENTER: s/ Thomas A. Varlan CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?