Daniels v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV1)
Filing
34
ORDER accepting in whole 33 the Report and Recommendation and granting Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act 29 . Plaintiff is AWARDED $5,002.33 in attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on June 20, 2016. (AYB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WILLIE GARRETT DANIELS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No.:
3:14-CV-546-TAV-CCS
ORDER
This Social Security appeal is before the Court on the Report and
Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge C. Clifford Shirley, Jr., on
June 2, 2016 [Doc. 33].
There have been no timely objections to the Report and
Recommendation and enough time has passed since the filing of the Report and
Recommendation to treat any objections as having been waived.
See 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). In the Report and Recommendation, the magistrate
judge recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal Access to
Justice Act [Doc. 29] be granted, and that a judgment be entered awarding plaintiff
$5,002.33 for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act.
The Court has carefully reviewed this matter, including the underlying motions,
and the Court is in agreement with the magistrate judge’s recommendations, which the
Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN
WHOLE the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 33], and it is ORDERED that the
Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act [Doc. 29]
be granted. Plaintiff is AWARDED $5,002.33 in attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal
Access to Justice Act.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas A. Varlan
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?