McBride et al v. Cunningham et al (PLR1)

Filing 28

ORDER granting 27 Joint Motion for Defendants' Withdrawal of their Motion to Stay Proceedings on Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Class Certification, Expedited Discovery, and Court Authorized Notice. Accordingly, D efendants' Motion to Stay Proceedings on Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Class Certification, Expedited Discovery, and Court Authorized Notice 20 is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Clifford Shirley, Jr on 3/19/15. (ADA, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE JENNIFER MCBRIDE and CHRISTINA MOLINA Individually and on behalf of similarly situated employees, Plaintiffs, v. ROGER CUNNINGHAM d/b/a THE BED STORE, and ROGER CUNNINGHAM, Individually, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:15-cv-10-PLR-CCS ORDER This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Rules of this Court, and Standing Order 13-02. Now before the Court is parties’ Joint Motion for Defendants’ Withdrawal of their Motion to Stay Proceedings on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Class Certification, Expedited Discovery, and Court Authorized Notice [Doc. 27] filed on March 18, 2015. Therein, the Plaintiffs and Defendants move that the Defendants be granted permission to withdraw their Motion to Stay [Doc. 20] that was filed on March 4, 2015. Based upon the expressed agreement by all parties, the Joint Motion for Defendants’ Withdrawal of their Motion to Stay Proceedings on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Class Certification, Expedited Discovery, and Court Authorized Notice [Doc. 27] is well-taken and is GRANTED. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Class Certification, Expedited Discovery, and Court Authorized Notice [Doc. 20] is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. ENTER: s/ C. Clifford Shirley, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?