Turner v. Alcoa, Inc. et al (TV1)

Filing 29

ORDER: The Court OVERRULES plaintiffs objection to the R&R 25 , and DENIESas moot defendants contingent objection 26 . Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS INWHOLE the R&R 23 . Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Record 12 ishereby DENIED, and the defendants Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record 14 is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 2/15/17. (ABF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DONALD K. TURNER, Plaintiff, v. ALCOA, INC., and HIGHMARK INC., d/b/a, HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.: 3:15-CV-270-TAV-HBG ORDER For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion entered contemporaneously herewith, the Court OVERRULES plaintiff’s objection to the R&R [Doc. 25], and DENIES as moot defendants’ contingent objection [Doc. 26]. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R [Doc. 23]. Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Record [Doc. 12] is hereby DENIED, and the defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. 14] is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Thomas A. Varlan CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT s/ Debra C. Poplin CLERK OF COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?