Turner v. Alcoa, Inc. et al (TV1)

Filing 29

ORDER: The Court OVERRULES plaintiffs objection to the R&R 25 , and DENIESas moot defendants contingent objection 26 . Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS INWHOLE the R&R 23 . Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Record 12 ishereby DENIED, and the defendants Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record 14 is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 2/15/17. (ABF)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
DONALD K. TURNER,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALCOA, INC., and
HIGHMARK INC., d/b/a,
HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS
BLUE SHIELD,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No.:

3:15-CV-270-TAV-HBG

ORDER
For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion entered contemporaneously
herewith, the Court OVERRULES plaintiff’s objection to the R&R [Doc. 25], and DENIES
as moot defendants’ contingent objection [Doc. 26]. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN
WHOLE the R&R [Doc. 23]. Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Record [Doc. 12] is
hereby DENIED, and the defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record
[Doc. 14] is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Thomas A. Varlan
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT
s/ Debra C. Poplin
CLERK OF COURT