Truslow et al v. Cook
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM OPINION in support of the following Order dismissing case. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 1/23/17. (c/m)(ADA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
DAKOTA
TRUSLOW,
TERANCE
HUDSON,
DOMINIC
BROWN,
MARQUES
BONDS,
TYANGUS
DEERING, JOE WAYNE WATSON,
JEREMY DUNCAN, REGGIE TAYLOR,
RANDY TANT, LEROY LONG, SHAUN
CAMPBELL,
TIMOTHY
KROL,
LAPRINCE BEACH, and JEREMY
BROWN,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DOUG COOK,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No.: 3:16-cv-00119
REEVES/SHIRLEY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is a pro se prisoners’ complaint for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 22,
2016, the Court entered an order in which the Court, inter alia, directed the Clerk to send each
Plaintiff a copy of the last page of the complaint in this case and ordered Plaintiffs to sign the
complaint and send it back within thirty (30) days of entry of that order [Doc. 8 p. 3]. Plaintiffs
were notified that if they did not timely comply with the order and return the last page of the
complaint with their signature, the complaint may be stricken [Id.].
Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a).
More than thirty days have passed since entry of the relevant order and the Court’s docket
establishes that no Plaintiff has sent back a signed last page of the complaint. Accordingly, the
complaint [Doc. 1] will be STRICKEN, there is nothing for the Court to decide in this case, and
this case will therefore be DISMISSED.
The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith
and would be totally frivolous. See Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
AN APPROPRIATE ORDER WILL ENTER.
ENTER:
___________________________________
_
_
_
______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
A
S
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?