McNabb et al v. Smoky Mountain Children's Home (TV3)

Filing 21

Order granting Motion to Consolidate Cases. Cases associated: Create association to 3:14-CV-234. All future filings shall be made in the lead case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 1/13/17. (JBR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
LARRY WAITMAN and ROBIN WAITMAN,
individually and on behalf of similarly-situated
employees
Plaintiffs,

)
)
)
)
)
v.
)
No. 3:14-CV-234-TAV-HBG
)
SMOKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN’S HOME,
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________________________________________________________
CALVIN MCNABB, GLORIA ALMARAZ,
GRAYSON DAGNAN, and KYLE PEACOCK,
individually and on behalf of similarly-situated
employees,
Plaintiffs,
v.
SMOKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN’S HOME,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:16-CV-140-TAV-HBG

ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION
These cases are before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Rules of this Court,
and Standing Order 13-02.
Now before the Court are two Joint Motions to Consolidate [Docs. 111, 20], which were
filed by the parties in Waitman et al. v. Smoky Mountain Children’s Home, 3:14-cv-234 and
McNabb et al. v. Smoky Mountain Children’s Home, 3:16-cv-140, respectively. In their motion,
the parties request that Waitman et al. v. Smoky Mountain Children’s Home, 3:14-cv-234 be
consolidated with McNabb et al. v. Smoky Mountain Children’s Home, 3:16-cv-140. The parties

state that both cases have settled and that the parties intend to file a joint motion to approve the
settlement as soon as both actions are consolidated. Further, the parties explain that the factual and
legal issues in Waitman overlap with the McNabb lawsuit. The parties state that in both cases, they
disputed whether the Defendant is subject to “enterprise coverage” under the Fair Labor Standards
Act. In addition, the parties disputed over overlapping issues, including the number of hours
worked by the Plaintiffs, whether the costs of food and housing provided to the Plaintiffs
constituted wages, the proper calculation of the “regular rates” for the Plaintiffs, whether the
“fluctuating workweek” method of calculating overtime pay applied, and what statute of
limitations applied. Finally, the parties state that the Waitman Plaintiffs and the McNabb Plaintiffs
are represented by the same counsel and that the parties in both cases have reached a global
settlement.
The Court finds that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) permits the Court to consolidate
cases that present common questions of law or fact. The Court finds that these cases present
common questions of law and fact, and the Court finds that it is appropriate to consolidate the two
actions. Accordingly, the Court finds that the Joint Motions to Consolidate [Docs. 111, 20] are
well-taken, and they are GRANTED.
Because it is the first-filed of the two cases, it is ORDERED that Waitman et al. v. Smoky
Mountain Children’s Home, 3:14-cv-234 SHALL SERVE as the lead case for purposes of this
consolidation, and all future filings shall only be made in Waitman et al. v. Smoky Mountain
Children’s Home, 3:14-cv-234.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTER:

United States Magistrate Judge

2