Brittney Gobble Photography, LLC v. Wenn Limited et al
Filing
77
ORDER Regarding Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Clifford Shirley, Jr on 1/26/18. (JBR) (copy mailed to USA Entertainment News, Inc. and Wenn Limited) Modified text on 1/26/2018 (JBR).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
BRITTNEY GOBBLE PHOTOGRAPHY, LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
WENN LIMITED, and USA ENTERTAINMENT )
NEWS, INC., d/b/a/ “WENN” and “WORLD
)
ENTERTAINMENT NEWS NETWORK,”
)
)
Defendants.
)
No. 3:16-CV-306-HSM-CCS
ORDER
This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the Rules of this Court,
and Standing Order 13-02.
The parties telephonically appeared before the Court on January 24, 2018, over a discovery
dispute. Attorney Dale Quisenberry appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.
Lloyd Beiny was also
present. During the telephonic conference, Plaintiff stated that it wanted to depose Jonny Forsyth,
Hayley Chamberlain, Clare Penn, and Matthew Walker via telephone. Beiny stated that he would
arrange the depositions of Jonny Forsyth, Hayley Chamberlain, and Matthew Walker. He stated
that he would discuss with Clare Penn her availability for a telephonic deposition but that she does
not work for the Defendants. Plaintiff and Beiny agreed to work together to arrange these
depositions.
Plaintiff also stated that it served discovery requests on Defendants in November 2017, but
that Defendants have not responded. The Court ordered Defendants to answer the discovery on or
before February 23, 2018. Plaintiff agreed to resend the discovery to Beiny via email. Further,
Plaintiff stated that during Beiny’s deposition on December 1, 2017, he agreed to investigate and
provide follow-up information and documents. Plaintiff stated that despite sending Beiny an email
identifying the documents discussed at the deposition, Beiny has not provided such documents.
Beiny stated that some documents were in the possession of third-parties and that some documents
did not exist. The Court ordered Beiny to produce such documents, to the extent they exist, on or
before February 2, 2018.
Further, Plaintiff stated that the Court’s previous Order [Doc. 74] ordered Beiny to produce
customer agreements and that Beiny has failed to produce the documents. Plaintiff stated it needed
specific customer agreements as opposed to template agreements. The Court ordered Beiny to
produce all existing customer agreements with the customers who Defendants distributed the
subject images to on or before February 2, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTER:
s/ C. Clifford Shirley, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?