Davis v. USA

Filing 6

JUDGMENT ORDER: Petitioner's § 2255 motion [Doc. 1 in Case No. 3:16-cv-467, Doc. 1155 in Case No. 3:15-cr-107-25] is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. If Petitioner files a notice of appeal from this judgment, such noti ce of appeal will be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability, which is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) and Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) because she has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a federal const itutional right. The Court CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Fed. R. App. P. 24 that any such appeal from this judgment would be frivolous and not taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on February 25, 2019. (copy mailed to Cindy D. Davis 48562-074, ALDERSON FEDERAL PRISON CAMP, Inmate Mail/Parcels, GLEN RAY RD. BOX A, ALDERSON, WV 24910) (AYB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE CINDY DELYNN DAVIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Nos. 3:16-cv-467 3:15-cr-107-25 Judge Phillips JUDGMENT ORDER For the reasons expressed in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Petitioner’s § 2255 motion [Doc. 1 in Case No. 3:16cv-467, Doc. 1155 in Case No. 3:15-cr-107-25] is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. If Petitioner files a notice of appeal from this judgment, such notice of appeal will be treated as an application for a certificate of appealability, which is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) and Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) because she has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. The Court CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Fed. R. App. P. 24 that any such appeal from this judgment would be frivolous and not taken in good faith. ENTER: s/ Thomas W. Phillips SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?